Ma`rifat Siyasi

The recognition and distinction of sciences from each other is a key issue in the philosophy of science and epistemological fields that has a significant impact on both the development of sciences and the regulation of the relationships between them. Determining precise criteria for distinguishing sciences helps to achieve a more precise understanding of the position and goals of each science. Explaining the distinction between the principles of governmental jurisprudence and others depends on examining the factors that distinguish the principles of governmental jurisprudence from non-governmental ones. In this research, which has not been addressed so far, the possibility of such a distinction has been examined using a descriptive-analytical method and the final conclusion has been reached that the principles of governmental jurisprudence, as a new trend in the knowledge of the principles of jurisprudence, is a response to emerging needs in the field of social, political, and governmental jurisprudence. This trend has fundamental differences and profound distinctions compared to the principles of non-governmental or termed jurisprudence, and by addressing macro-social and governmental issues, it introduces itself as an independent trend.